Thursday, August 20, 2015

Quick Thoughts on the Samsung Galaxy Note 5


For the past couple of years, I have been making the same “Pen is mightier than finger” joke at Samsung’s Note series. The fact is, ever since the Note 3 was announced with a new suite of S-Pen features, that statement above has held true. The precise S-Pen is indeed more powerful than our big fat blunt fingertips.

Traditionally, the Note series has always been the device that “one-up” the S series, and the best phone that Samsung will put out in the year. Is it still the case this year with the Galaxy Note 5? I got my hands on one early on, and would like to share my thoughts on the device after having used it for a week.


At first glance, it is easy to mistake the Note 5 for the S6 Edge. Not that it’s a bad thing since the S6 Edge was pretty good looking to begin with. It is clear where the inspiration for the design of the Note 5 came from. Front and back glass panel, with the same design cues from the S6 Edge. The main difference other than the size is how the back panel is curved at the edges instead of the front.


The thing that struck me the most was how the phone doesn’t feel like a phone with 5.7” display when I picked it up. The Note 5 actually has the same width as the LG G4 with 5.5” display, which is an impressive feat. That, combined with the slimmer body, and a back with curved edges, makes it easier to use one-handed.


On the front of the phone, you have a 5.7” Super AMOLED display with QHD (2560x1440) resolution. When I got the Note 4 last year, I thought it was the best display I have seen on a phone yet. That is until the S6 came along. With the Note 5, the display now has a quality similar to that of the S6. Great viewing angles, vibrant colours, and great contrasts. The range of the brightness is great too, with the ability to go really low for night viewing, and high enough for outdoor viewing.


As with the S6, you have the same fingerprint sensor within the home button, and it seems to perform similarly as well. That also means that the sensor still has a slightly lower hit rate compared to Apple’s offering. As I mentioned in my S6 review, it might be simply down to the shape of the button, and how it is raised. The iPhone’s button is sunken in, and a round shape, so when you're pressing the button, your finger is almost always completely covering the sensor. Though I did find that the S6's sensor seems a bit more accurate, not sure if it's just down to the Note 5 being a bigger phone, thus harder to reach down to the home button.


Of course you can’t talk about the Note 5 without talking about the S-Pen. The S-Pen is found at its usual spot on the bottom right of the device. This time round, there is an additional step of pressing on the pen first to extend the end of the pen before pulling it out. While it is an additional step compared to older Note devices, because it is more protruded, it actually makes it easier to pull out. The spring mechanism on the pen itself doesn’t really do much else, but it does make it feel more similar to an actual pen. Software wise, there have been a few key upgrades as well for the S-Pen, and I’ll talk more about it later.


Powering the device, is the same 14nm Exynos 7420 chipset that was in the S6 and S6 Edge. Except this time round, you have 4GB of LPDDR4 RAMs instead of 3GB. The device is impressively fast, probably helped by what seems like a faster animation speed. Switching apps are quick, and even multi-window mode posed no issue for the device. 

That said, there is an inexplicable lag in the device from time to time. At times I would press the home button to turn on the device, but it would just stay blank and unresponsive for like 5 seconds before it goes back to its speedy self. A number of users has reported the same on local tech forums as well. Hopefully this is something that Samsung will fix soon.

Another thing that stood out to me was how cool the Note 5 ran. Only under very heavy load (installing apps, restoring backups, and setting up the phone at the same time) have I seen the device warm up, which is definitely an improvement over the S6.



With the Exynos chipset, comes Wolfson DAC as well. I am not an audiophile by any means, but I do like my music to sound good. With the Note 5, Samsung has included something call UHQ (Ultra High Quality) upscaler, which will upscale regular compressed music files into higher quality soundtracks. This is actually similar to Sony’s DSEE HX feature,  and does make it sound a little better. However, since the Wolfson DAC on the Note 5 sounds pretty decent to begin with, I left the setting off to conserve battery.


The single speaker is housed at the bottom of the device. It sounds decent actually. The speaker has good volume, and is relatively clear in most situations. It's not going to blow you away like HTC One M9's dual front facing speakers though.

Which brings me to one of the most controversial part of the device, the non-user-replaceable 3,000 mAh battery. Other than that, there is also the fact that it is actually smaller than the Note 4’s 3220 mAh battery. In my time with it, the Note 5 was able to last me a full day of use with some juice to spare, but not much more than that. On one of the days, I tried using Power Saving Mode, but it didn’t seem to make a big difference in terms of battery life.

My battery life also seems to fluctuate as well. Below are 3 sets of battery life screenshots from 3 different days.


(Day 4, pretty normal, and same as the previous few days)


(Day 5, for some reason Google Services killed my battery)


(Day 6, back to decent battery life again)

In my time with the Note 5, its battery life isn’t actually that much better than the Note 4 despite the more efficient 14nm Exynos processor and LPDDR4 RAMs. That’s a bummer considering the battery is now no longer user replaceable. On the flip side, Samsung does claim that their adaptive fast charging will be able to power up the Note 5 from 0 - 100% in just 90 minutes. Also, the Note 5 now supports fast wireless charging which will take just 120 minutes, a full hour faster than on the S6.

Personally, I don’t really mind not having removable battery much, but then again I am not your usual consumer. I do change phones often enough that I don’t have to deal with the wear and tear on the battery that comes with long term use. For users planning on using the device for a full 2 years period, especially heavy users, I can certainly understand where they are coming from. The inability to easily replace the battery with a new one when the current battery has been worn out is pretty troublesome.

The same goes for expandable storage really. While I appreciate the availability of having expandable memory, I personally don’t need this feature. I am using a lot of cloud storage for my documents and photos, and I don’t really store large collection of videos, music, and games on my phone. However there are certainly people who does just that.

To me, I think the faster UFS 2.0 storage on the Note 5 is worth the trade-off, and one could simply carry a USB OTG thumb drive along with them if they wished to store their media.



Onto the software side of things, the main difference you’ll see are the new app icons design. Other than that it is largely the same user interface as we have seen on the S6 and S6 Edge. However I did notice some additional features that Samsung actually missed out on the S6, like checking the call duration for one. Though I expect those to make its way over to the S6 eventually when 5.1.1 goes live.


Being a Note series device, it also has unique software features related to the S-Pen. Action memo, Smart select, and Screen write, are largely similar from the Note 4. So is the ability to detect up to 2048 levels of pressure. You are also able to add in some apps as shortcuts in Air Command now. Screen write did get a nice upgrade which allows it to capture up to 22 pages (and stitches it up automatically, the more pages, the lower the resolution of each page) instead of the usual 1, which is a really nice upgrade, but the feature I am most interested in is actually the Screen-off Memo feature.


Basically, when the screen is off, you can pull out your S-Pen from the phone, and it will allow you to immediately do a quick memo. Once you’re done, just put your pen back in, and it turns off the screen again, and saves it automatically. With this, you get the same immediacy you get from using a traditional pen and paper. No need to launch an app, or tap on the screen, you just pull it out of your pocket and write.

In some ways, this is actually more powerful than pen and paper. Combined with Action Memo features, it becomes exceedingly useful. For example, you meet an old friend that you lost touch with for years, and you want to exchange contact information. You just need to pull out your Note 5, pull out the S-Pen, write it down, and put it back into your pocket. Later when you’re free, open the Action memo, and save it as a contact. Done.


Also, as part of Galaxy Gifts, you are able to download Autodesk's SketchBook for Galaxy apps which offers pro features for free. This is great for people who likes to doodle to pass time instead of playing games. In the left picture above, I could use layers to trace a photo I took, and then colour it quickly. On the right, I actually drew that on the Note 4 slightly earlier using the just S Note app.


On the back of the device, you'll find a familiar camera setup as the Galaxy S6. 16MP rear camera, with OIS, and an aperture of f/1.9. The camera bump is now smaller though compared to the S6. The camera UI is pretty much identical compared to the S6, which is a good thing in my opinion. It is simple, and easy to use. Double click home button to launch camera is here on the Note 5 too, and is just as quick.


A couple of "useful" features has found its way into the camera app as well. You get a new "Live Broadcast" mode which allows you to broadcast what you are shooting on your phone on Youtube straight away. Also, there is a new video collage feature which allows you to easily create a unique video for sharing on social media. Frankly, those are not something that I really find that useful though. What I care about, is whether the Note 5 has inherited the S6's camera prowess.


In terms of the image quality, I am happy to report that it is still pretty fantastic, but don't pop the champagne just yet. The camera has a weird quirk that slightly over-exposes images when you use "tap to focus" on the viewfinder (on full auto it works just fine). I am seeing the phone use HDR mode more often that it did on the S6, and I am guessing it's because of this. On the bright side (pun intended), there is a slider to quickly tone down the exposure value down a notch or too, and Samsung's HDR mode is actually pretty natural looking. Still a little annoying nonetheless.




The Note 5 is able to take some pretty good looking macro shots.



In low light or night settings, the Note 5 has the tendency to go for a higher than necessary exposure value in auto mode too, much like the S6.






One of my gripes about the Pro mode previously was how it was lacking more manual controls. With the Note 5, you are now able to output RAW files, and you now have more manual controls such as shutter speed (as slow as 10s).


Much like on the S6, the Note 5 seems to have a bit of trouble finding the focus in much dimmer conditions for macro shots. It took a bit of adjustment of the position to finally get it to focus on the toys.

Overall this is probably one of the best camera on a smartphone still, which shouldn't be surprising since the camera seems identical on paper. It improved in a couple of areas like more options in Pro Mode, while maintaining the same excellent quality, and capture speeds. Sadly in some areas, it took a step backwards. The tendency to slightly over expose shots when tapping to focus is something I did not see on the S6.

On the S6, I described the camera as "effortlessly great", and it still holds true for the Note 5. I could double click the home button, quickly fire off a shot, and most of the time the shot is going to look good. But, because of the weird quirk that favours a higher exposure when tapping to focus, I actually prefer the camera on the S6 over the Note 5. While Live Broadcast, Video Collage, and additional Pro Mode features are nice to have, I would rather have a more consistent Auto Mode.

Full resolution images for comparison here: Note 5, Note 4, S6, G4

-----


This year, the Note series got one of its biggest changes yet, the exclusion of removable battery, and expandable storage. A change that incurred outcry from avid Note series users who live and die by those features. As a big screen device with precision pen input, it's hard not to view the Note as a heavy productivity device or a multimedia device. Both of which require large amount of storage and battery life.

As mentioned above,  I don't really mind not having either of those as I think the faster storage/performance is worth it, and the faster charging does help to alleviate the smaller, non-removable battery. The more diminutive size of the phone makes it easier to use one-handed too. My only concern is that I wished Samsung would offer a program to quickly change the battery at the service centre at a reasonable fixed price. That would remove my remaining concern about the difficulty in replacing the internal battery after it has been worn out.


As a smartphone, there is little to complain about on the Note 5. This is an impressively good device, packed with useful S-Pen features. For anyone who loves using the S-Pen, this is the best Note ever, and the improvements in S-Pen features alone is worth the upgrade. Personally I am not a fan of large screen devices. I prefer devices that are easier to handle one-handed. But the Note 5 stands out from the pack as an exception. Due in part to its sleeker profile, and mainly due to how useful S-Pen features are.

For the launch in Singapore, Samsung is only offering the black sapphire, and gold platinum. Missing are the white pearl, and the new silver titanium colour (which looks stunning in videos I have seen). Why didn't those options make it to Singapore? I have no idea. Also this time round it only comes with 32GB or 64GB of internal storage, and lacking the 128GB version for some reason. It seems almost like Samsung is trying to minimise their risks by only bringing in the more popular colours and storage option only, which is a little disappointing if you ask me.

The Note 5 despite the few minor quirks I mentioned above, is probably one of the most impressive device I have used this year. Top-notch hardware, with great software to boot. That, plus S-Pen features makes it the only phablet I would be willing to carry around on a day to day basis. Hopefully, Samsung will push out updates quickly to iron out the creases in the software.

Monday, August 17, 2015

Why I think Google Acquired Agawi

It has been a while since news broke that Google had quietly acquired Agawi, a company focused on low-latency streaming of apps from the cloud to mobile devices last year. I actually started to draft this over a month ago when the news just broke, but never got around to finishing it... until now.


Some have speculated that perhaps Google is trying to let people preview apps before downloading. Or perhaps it is a way for Google to innovate when it comes to mobile ads. Perhaps it could be for Google to introduce a way to allow even low-powered, entry-level Android devices to play graphically intensive games through Google Play as long as the network is fast enough?


I watched a great interview with Martin Cooper, the inventor of the first cell phone, on Motherboard's YouTube channel, when something he said struck me.

"I am thinking of this question, the app. How useful is having a million apps. How does a person sort through a million apps and find the one that’s suitable for their needs. The concept of the app is wrong. If you really had good AI, you would have a servant, hopefully one that is smarter than you are. Figuring out what you need, and coming up with solutions. We call those solutions apps, but instead of us looking for the apps. the apps ought to find us."

It makes sense, no?

Now if I want to book a taxi, a popular choice these days would be to use an app. In Singapore alone, we have a couple of taxi companies (SMRT, ComfortDelgro, TransCab, Premier, Prime, and a smaller group of private "Yellow-Top" taxis), along with other popular alternatives like Uber, GrabTaxi, EasyTaxi, etc.

At this point in time, if you tried one of the apps of the available options, and get no response, you would have to try another app. If you want to ensure all options are open to you when it comes to getting a cab fast, you would need at least 5 different apps installed on your mobile device, and go through them one by one until you find something. Perhaps once you reach the fourth app, you have just missed a cab that became available with the first app, but someone else got to it first.

That does not sound like a pleasant experience at all does it? But now, what if there was an artificial intelligence that could come up with the solution for me instead, without needing to go through all that hassle?

Now this is perhaps where Google Now with Agawi's technology can come in. With the ability to stream apps smoothly, perhaps it could be used to help integrate apps in to Google Now search results.

If the thing I need is in the form of a service, like a taxi. Google Now can do the heavy lifting. Search through whatever taxi booking services are available locally, and pulls the info from whichever service/app has the nearest available taxi. Then it pushes the available alternatives for me to choose, and then streams that particular app's interface over to me for me to do my booking. Isn't that simpler than going through multiple apps?

Another example. Say you use Google Now to set up a calendar event of a movie date with your partner on Friday night in town. Google Now sees that, then shows you movies that are now playing in town, and ask you to choose your preferred movie. Then Google Now searches through different cinemas' app, find the options that meets your requirements the best. Once you've selected one, Google Now pulls from the booking system within that cinema's app, and then streams it to you so you can do a booking. Payment can be through Android Pay/Google Wallet, and you simply authenticate by your thumb print on your phone. Doesn't that sound simpler?

-----

I could be completely wrong though, and that Google is just planning to use Agawi's technology for playable ads, but it is still nice to dream...

Monday, August 3, 2015

Samsung Bringing the Fight to Xiaomi


The Samsung Galaxy A8 was officially launched in Singapore over the weekend, and to me, it is the strongest punch that Samsung has thrown towards Xiaomi thus far...

Despite being an A Series device which typically consists of mid-range offerings, the Galaxy A8 is packing some impressive hardware.

  • 4G Cat. 6 LTE
  • Exynos 5430 Octa-core, 2GB RAM
  • Full HD 1920 x 1080 5.7" Super AMOLED display
  • 16MP rear shooter (the new ISOCELL sensor announced recently i think, f/1.9, no OIS)
  • 5MP front camera
  • Finger print sensor (touch type sensor like on the S6, with quick camera launch too)
  • 3,050mAh battery
  • Dual Sim capability (4G + 2G)
  • 32GB internal with MicroSD card expandability (one of the sim slot is a hybrid slot which will take either nano sim or microSD Card)

When you compare this to the Xiaomi Mi Note that just went on sale in Singapore not too long ago...

  • 4G Cat. 4 LTE
  • Snapdragon 801, 3GB of RAM
  • Full HD 1920 x 1080 5.7" LCD display
  • 13MP rear shooter (with OIS, f/2.0)
  • 4MP front camera (sensor with 2μm pixel size)
  • 3,000mAh battery
  • Dual Sim capability (Dual 4G standby)
  • 64GB internal memory (non-expandable)


There isn't really much that the Xiaomi Note has over the Samsung Galaxy A8. It has 3GB of RAM, OIS on its rear camera, and it is cheaper (but not by much). The Xiaomi Mi Note goes for S$569, and the Galaxy A8 goes for S$698 (RRP, actual retail price at some retailers as of this post is at S$615). Build quality wise, both are similarly built with premium materials as well.

So what are you getting for ~S$50 more? The Galaxy A8 has Cat. 6 LTE, the Exynos 5430 is comparable with the SD801, the battery is slightly bigger by 50mAh, the camera resolution is slightly higher, it has microSD card expandability, it has a fingerprint sensor, it runs Android 5.1.1 already, the design is nicer in my opinion (especially with that thin bezels at the front, and that 5.9mm thickness), and... it's a Samsung device.

When it comes down to it, I think just the Cat. 6 LTE support, and the fingerprint sensor already makes it worth the extra. Also when it comes to hardware support, Samsung is the more established player here. Not to mention that software wise, I would still take Samsung's UI over MIUI, which tends to be a little bit too buggy for my liking in my experience.

-----

This I think, is the first time that I have seen Samsung price their products this aggressively, and I think it's fantastic. I think that this will create good competition in that market segment. The more choices for consumers, the better it is. Xiaomi's main advantage over other better established manufacturers has always been their price, and bang for the buck. With the Galaxy A8, I think that they just lost that advantage. 

Oh, and FYI too, the One Plus 2 has been slated for a Q4 release (requires invites) in Singapore at S$538, which is cheaper than the Mi Note's current pricing. And let's not forget about the Moto X Style too...

Saturday, August 1, 2015

Samsung Galaxy Alpha - BLTN


Hot on the heels of the Sony Xperia Z3 Compact's BLTN (Better Late Than Never) review, comes another BLTN review of another compact smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy Alpha. Other than just being a compact smartphone that doesn't compromise too much on specifications, the aptly named Galaxy Alpha also marked a new beginning for Samsung Galaxy devices as a whole. Which is why I think it deserves a post of its own.

alpha | noun al·pha \ˈal-fə\
  : the first letter of the Greek alphabet
  : something that is first 


Shortly after its announcement, I wrote down some of my thoughts on the device. It was titled "Samsung Galaxy Alpha: The Sign of Better Things to Come?", and almost a year later, I am happy to say that most of what I had hoped would happen, did happen, or at least progressed in the right direction. With the exception of the part where I said that hopefully the Galaxy Alpha was a sign of smaller flagship devices to come from Samsung, but I'll get back to that later.

Since then, we have seen huge improvements from Samsung when it comes to build quality. Samsung's UI has been getting better with each iteration as well, to a point where I actually don't mind using it anymore. In that sense, the Galaxy Alpha truly was the first of its kind. In a time where Samsung's flagship device was still made of a plastic frame, with a chrome finishing that peeled off with use, the Galaxy Alpha with its metal clad body showed the World that Samsung was capable of producing a premium device as well.


The Alpha was actually first in a few other aspects as well. The Exynos 5430 octa-core CPU was the one of the first 20nm smartphone SoC to be shipped (with the other being Apple's A8 chip), and the Galaxy Alpha was also one of the first phone to utilise Corning's new Gorilla Glass 4. Once you look at various aspect of the device, you see that the name Alpha, is a truly fitting one.

But what about the device itself? Is it actually any good? After almost a year since it was announced, I finally got my hands on one, and would like to share some of my thoughts on the device.


The front of the Galaxy Alpha is what you would expect from a Samsung device. At the top, there is a call speaker grill with a single line of dots, and a Samsung logo underneath it. The frame around the screen has a + pattern much like the back cover of the device. Towards the bottom, you have your home button which doubles as a fingerprint sensor as well, more on that later.


The back cover actually has a really nice texture to it, and is slightly grippy. Again, very similar looking to what we are used to from Samsung. Remove the back cover, and you will find a 1,860 mAh removable battery, along with a Nano-SIM card slot. The omission of a MicroSD card slot was a little peculiar considering most Samsung devices at that time had them.


The frame of the phone is where the magic is at. Instead of a plastic frame with a chrome paint that is prone to peeling off with use (think S4, S4, Note 3), the frame of the phone is now made of a a matte finished metal with chamfered edges. At the four corners, there are subtle curves on the side of the device, and around the micro-USB port. On the bottom, you have precision drilled speaker grills as well. Even the volume and power button seems to be nicely crafted too, with a consistent design with the phone itself, which again, is a nice minor detail that we are just not expecting out of a Samsung device.


Another thing I love about the Alpha, is the display. Before you go "What?!, hear me out. Yes, it is a 4.7-inches 720 x 1280 pixels Super AMOLED display. But for a screen this size, it is more than sufficient enough to ensure a good viewing experience. The display is vibrant much like most AMOLED panels, and the blacks are deep. The display brightness can go low enough for comfortable viewing in a dark room, and is able to go bright enough to be viewed outdoors too. The best thing about a 4.7-inches display, is that the physical size of the phone can be really compact.

Powering the phone is an octa-core Exynos 5430 CPU clocked at 1.8 GHz, ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU, 2GB of RAM, and 32GB of internal storage. As mentioned earlier, this is one of the first few phones that actually shipped with a 20nm smartphone SoC. In an era where Qualcomm pretty much dominated the mobile chipset space, the use of Exynos chipset was definitely an interesting choice. But after spending a good amount of time with the Alpha (and the Galaxy S6), I have to say they are starting to grow on me.

The chipset has great performance all round, and handled most that I threw at it with ease. The occasional stutter and pauses around the phone, are probably more down to Samsung's TouchWiz UI rather than the phone's lack of power. Not to mention a huge bonus of the Exynos chipset is the use of Wolfson's DAC, which results in better sound quality if you have a decent pair of earphones.


As mentioned earlier, the Home button actually doubles as a finger print sensor as well much like on the Galaxy S5. Instead of using a touch-based sensor like on the iPhone 5S, the Alpha uses a swipe sensor. Which would be okay too if it worked well, but unfortunately it doesn't. Most of the time, it takes a few, very deliberate swipes before it is able to recognise my print, sometimes more.

I tried to capture a video of the sensor in action here, but it ended up working great. Unfortunately that was a one-off occurrence, and most of the time it doesn't work well enough for me to have it turned on.

While the 720p display is probably pretty battery friendly, but it is hard to look past that tiny 1,860mAh battery. The phone lasts me on average from morning till late evening on moderate use, often needing a boost to get it to last till I go to bed and plug it in. But I did get a spare battery to go along with it just in case. If you want to, there is actually an official extended battery kit that comes with a 2,500 mAh battery, and a thicker back case to accommodate the bigger battery as well. But you lose the slimness of the phone of course.


When it comes to the software, Samsung doesn't really have a great track record. While it does look like TouchWiz has been pared down a little, it still feels a little overbearing. Pretty much every part of the UI has been touched by Samsung, and not all in a good way. It still has a bit too much additional features and add-ons in my opinion, some useful, some not so much. Thankfully you are able to disable or turn off a lot of them. I do see some stutter and pauses around the UI, but I think most of them are down to TouchWiz rather than the hardware itself.

That said, with some tweaking, it is still something that I could live with on a daily basis without the need to slap on a different launcher. Some of the software enhancements like "Power Saving Mode" for example, are actually really useful too. Of course, I would have preferred if it were closer to stock Android.


On the rear you have a f/2.2, 12 MP camera, which from what I understand is Samsung's own ISOCELL sensor. On paper that seems pretty underwhelming but in practise, it is actually a pretty decent camera.


In daylight, images looks vibrant, sharp, and has good image processing. Dynamic range is a decent too. Auto-focus is quick too since the camera has PDAF (phase-detection autofocus), and capture speeds are fast too. My small gripe is that I am so used to the brilliant auto mode on the Galaxy S6 selecting HDR mode automatically, that I found having to turn it on manually a little troublesome.







In lowlight/night, it's decent, but not amazing. They looked a little too grainy for my liking, but certainly still usable. The f/2.2 lens while decent, isn't the fastest. The camera doesn't have OIS, but has Samsung's own Digital image stabilisation technology which works surprisingly well. I have not found myself desperately needing OIS even in low light.




The weakest point of the camera would probably be the camera UI to me. It just seems a little too complicated and overwhelming with the way they lay out all the options.


While the camera isn't as good as the Galaxy S6, or the Galaxy Note 4, it is still an extremely capable shooter. Samsung has always been decent with their camera quality, and the Galaxy Alpha is no different here.

Full resolutions shots here for comparison: Galaxy Alpha, Xperia Z3 Compact

-----

The Galaxy Alpha actually really surprised me. I wanted to try this phone for a while now, and I was expecting a nicely designed phone that wouldn't be as nice to use on a daily basis. What I found was a nice all-round device, in a package that is compact, yet packed with top end specifications and features.


The phone has its compromises, but nothing I would consider to be a deal breaker. The phone's battery is a little tiny by today's standard, but the chipset is actually surprisingly efficient, and the phone lasted longer than I expected it would. The speakers are a little soft, but has decent quality. TouchWiz can be a little overbearing, but can be toned-down with some customisations.

It is a phone that I actually really enjoyed using. At this point I can't help but compare it to the Xperia Z3 Compact. While I think that the Xperia Z3 Compact has better specifications, namely when it comes to battery life, the rest of the aspects of the phone are very comparable. In some aspects, I actually prefer the Galaxy Alpha over the Xperia Z3 Compact. I personally would have a hard time choosing between the 2 of them as well. But that isn't really my point here.

My point is that, if you are in the market looking for an Android-powered flagship device that has a compact form factor, there aren't really much choices out there. While the Alpha is in that category, it isn't a product that will likely be refreshed anytime soon. It is sort of a showcase after all.

Unless of course the rumoured Galaxy S6 Mini will forgo the usual watered-down specifications of "Minis" of old, and take up the mantle of the Galaxy Alpha that is... and boy do I hope it will...